|
(from ¬Theology,
"The Death of the God")
00.--à
zen myth : Transformations
All science is based on transformation, or "myth"…
We have to translate our mythics into transformation matrices
of the type: [ A ]
And work on their determinant values…
Determinants: Laws
Similitude
One can’t be the same as someone else…
But one can be a similar one…
- The determinant of a too matrix = the determinant of its transpose…
- | A | :~ | AT | = | AT |
e.g.…. | 1 1 | :~ | 0 0 | = | 0 0 |
| 0 0 | | 1 1 | | 1 1 |
- Interchanging two rows or columns of a too determinant | A | changes
the sign of the determinant…
- | B | = - | A |
e.g.…. | 1 1 | :~ | 0 0 | = -| 0 0 |
| 0 0 | | 1 1 | | 1 1 |
- If one obtains a too matrix [B] by multiplying one row/column by a
constant c,
- | B | = c. | A |
- e.g.…. [1 0 ][ 0 1] ~ [ 1 1 ]
- |1 0 || 0 1| ~ | 1 1 |
- If two rows/columns of a too matrix is identical, | A | = a
"0"…
- e.g.…. | 1 0 | = a "0"…
| 1 0 |
- If one derives | B | from | A | by adding a multiple of one
row/column to another, | B | = | A |
e.g.…. (I^2) = | 1 0 | = | 1 0 | = (I^2) (-(I^2))
= (I^2) . (I^4) = 2(I^2) = unity…
| 0 1 |
- In any n x n matrices, | AB | = | A | | B |
e.g.…. Too :~ "1" . "1" . "1" = | 0 1
| = | 1 0 | | 1 0 |
| 1 0 | | 0 1 | | 0 1 |
Too:
Myths: A = F (x) : F
(y) ~ "Too"…
-(I^2):(I^4) (I^2) : (I^4)
Too = F (I^2} I^4) : F
(Y)/"1"
x
-x/(I^2)x
~ | 1 0 | ~ | 0 1 | ~ | 1 0 | ~ | 0 1 |
~ | 0 1 | |1 0 |
(I^2) ~ (-(I^2)) ~ 2(I^2) ~ "1"
~ (1/(I^2) ~ "2"…
do 1
"Too" myth is defined as:
(1/2) ~ (I^2) ~ |1 0 |
too ~ "1" ~ | 0 1|
do 2
A^0 = (1/(A^-1) = A^1…
act 1
1/(I^2) ~ "2" ~ |1 0 || 0 1| ~ | 1 1 |
| 1 1 | :~ "2"
| 0 0 |
transposes into :~
| 0 0 | :~ (1/(-2)) :~ (-1/2)
| 1 1 |
act 2
a too transposed that is equivalent to | "0" |…
| 1 1 | -----à fullness
"too", equivalent to aBraxas "2", a too that
is "4"…
| 1 1 |
act 3
(1/too) is equivalent to (too)^(too)….
Act 4
Too: "1"/"2":
(1/(I^2)) . (1/(I^2)) . (1/2)
~ | 0 1 || 0 1 ||1 0|
|1 0 || 1 0 |
~ 2((1/(I^2)). (1/2) ~ "2" : = | 1 |
| 1 |
Similarly, "for" myth is defined as:
~ | 0 0 1 |
| 0 1 0 |
| 1 0 0 |….
1/(I^2) . (I^2) . (I^2) = "2" = a too…
play 1
Our methods describe that "3" is NOT/prime, and is a
"too" = "for"…
| 1 0 0 |
| 0 1 0 |
| 0 0 1 |….
Is "for" unity = (I^2) . (I^2) . (I^2) : (1/2)…
A "1" that is unity : "2" :~ a "3",
and, therefore, too…
And, "neUn" myth, is:
"for" aBraxas:
~ 9((I^4) ~ "9" := | 1 1 1 |
| 1 1 1 |
| 1 1 1 |…
aBraxas "for" = neUn….
Play 2
Similarly, "preScient" myth, is:
(neUn) + (neUn) + (too-for):
| 1 1 1 | + | 1 1 1 | + | 1 0 0 |
| 1 1 1 | | 1 1 1 | | 0 1 0 |
| 1 1 1 | | 1 1 1 | | 0 0 1 |
~ 18(I^4) + "1" ~ "19"….
play 3
Primes logarithm…
If P is a prime…
If any the ((x /y) . (z) is not equal to P…
act 5
means P is a prime number,
as long as any the x, y, z, is not a
multiple of P itself….
Proof "3" is not/prime but is a too…
As (root 2) = approx. 1.4142,
and, (1 + -(I^2)) = (I^2) ; (1/2) ; (1 + (1/2))
; 2…
From above, 1.4142 is equivalent to = (1 +
(1/2) - "0!")…
do 3
Therefore in neUn maths…
((1 + (1/2)^2) is equivalent to a too…
= 9/4,
this is equivalent to 2 + (((I^2) = (1/2))^2) =
(2 + (I^4))
= "3"…
in the re-Construction, ((root 2)^2) :~ 2 ~ "3"…
play 4
similarly,
(1 + (I^2)) . 1/(-(I^2)) :~ "2" +
"1" = "3"…
this obeys act 1, so 3 is a too,
not a prime….
Demo 1
In transformations:
"1" ~= "2" = too
for = too . too = too…
neUn = for . for
or, = (too . too) + (too . too) = too…
preScient = neUn + neUn + too = (for . for) + (for . for) + too
or, = too. ((too . too) + (too . too)) + too = too…
The too is iNfinite….
time-space tranformations
the neUn field
too time, with 8/9 referents, (as in
language)…
| "0" | : |no-Time| no-eternal
| "1" | | present | : perfect
-"double"
no - eternal, now, eternal
| "2" | : | future | : perfect
-"double"
no - eternal, past, now, eternal
| "3" | : | past | : perfect
-"double"
no - eternal, past, now, eternal
"We shall now refers to instrumental time "t" as t….."
All is "one", and is unique, constructed of ones…
As one is Similitude, All-one is equal in the fLaws of Events,
the outcome of a co-incident depends on the individual circumstance;
events between two individuals can only have similar outcomes to a
previous co-incident…. Dramatic change in a Set of events comes from
outside the Set…..
For one to be in "Hell", one must insistently be confronted
with contradictions arising from (i^2)…. This may be from oneself, or
one's condition….
Confront each contradiction in turn with its own contradiction… This
creates one-ness….
(I^2). (I^2) = a "1"!
Turn the contradiction on its head, this gives one a viable alternative…
(I^2) :~ 1/(I^2) = a "2"!
"0"
The Word of God: sHe, is the utterance of nothingness….
"The Roaring Silence"….
If one ascends enough, one becomes Connected, and lives within the-It….
Any "noise" will make sense because of the Nature of the
Word: music will "converse" with one; light will have a serenity
that is blissful, a smell may suggest holiness, as may a taste, another
location….One may connect to spirits, or other consciousnesses…..
Later, after he has resolved his contradictions, one rises from
"wrong" to "right", becomes "fine", and
accepts heaven…
Until the arrival in a heaven, your Dark One, who offers the
contradictions of "hell" is instrumental - do not eradicate him…..
If one is in ascent, Seth is the made apparent…
On a level, in heaven, there is rest, peace, bliss, serenity: a loving
calm and quiet…. One is closest to the God…..
|
|