| Application
of method in Criticism…
"Lies"….
A "lie" is a direction of "truth": logical,
illogical, absurd, OR, false…
Critical Tests
(I^2) must come first as the PRE-PREMISE, "I must contradict"…
(I)
A premise that is absurd points to itself by being apposed, or
contradicted….
For example, "Stan is a feMale name"… (II)
If the pre-premise is no apposition, or contradiction to the
accepted synthesis, or common-sense, "norm" belief… This is
accepted truth
For Example, "This man Stan is a Male"… (III)
If this pre-premise is opposed/contradicted, and the
"myth" re-Constructs an elegance, which is obviously true, from known
facts, this is accepted truth…
For example, "If a man, Stan could not be a feMale name"…
(IV)
If, from (II), NOT (I), (no secondary truth is obviously
known)… the (original) premise is true, or illogical, or absurd… (V)
For example, "Stan is a male"….
Since, (II), do (IV), if it's true, the premise must be illogical…
(VI)
For Example, "Stan is a name"…
Since (II) do (IV), if it's not true, the premise must be absurd….
(VII)
For example, "Stan is not a female name"…
There follows a "lie"-test:
An illogic can be logical, and true, or absurd,
and FALSE…. (VIII)
For example, "Stan is a male name"…..
There are therefore feMale names (or, "things" in general)
which could be referenced to as "Stan", too…..
|